JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

The increasing use of tumor sequencing has intensified the need for fast, traceable interpretation of genomic variants. General-purpose large language models can produce fluent answers, but unsupported statements, weak provenance, and stale knowledge limit their suitability for clinical genomics. We developed OncoGenRAG, a research framework that combines a parameter-efficiently fine-tuned BioBERT classifier with an entity-aware retrieval system over a curated, multi-source oncology knowledge base. The reported knowledge base contains 933 harmonized records derived from CIViC, ClinVar/dbSNP, Open Targets, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, Ensembl Variation, and linked PubMed literature. The classifier assigns one of five labels: Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Variant of Uncertain Significance, Benign, or Oncogenic; the retrieval component ranks evidence records using subword TF-IDF similarity and explicit gene, variant, and cancer-type matches. A rejection rule suppresses answers when retrieval support is below a prespecified threshold. In the authors held-out evaluation, the classifier achieved 92.40% accuracy, 93.15% weighted precision, 92.40% weighted recall, and 92.65% weighted F1 score. In a separate benchmark of 100 clinical-style queries, OncoGenRAG achieved reported Precision@1 of 94.5%, Precision@3 of 96.8%, and 100% database grounding. No hallucinated answer was observed under the study operational definition, compared with a 41.0% no-hallucination rate for the ungrounded baseline. These results should be interpreted as internal validation rather than proof of universal safety because query construction, annotator agreement, class-specific performance, calibration, and external validation data were not available for independent analysis. OncoGenRAG provides a transparent design for evidence retrieval and abstention, but it is a research prototype and must not be used to select treatment without expert review.

Background: Adverse event (AE) coding is essential for safety monitoring in oncology clinical trials, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where intensive therapies are associated with frequent and heterogeneous toxicities requiring standardized MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) coding. However, manual Low-Level Term (LLT) assignment remains labor-intensive, subjective, and difficult to scale. Although large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising decision-support tools for automated coding, unguided zero-shot generation remains insufficient for reliable fine-grained MedDRA coding. Objective: To develop and evaluate a retrieval-augmented reasoning pipeline for clinically aligned LLT-level MedDRA coding of free-text adverse events from prospective AML clinical trials. Methods: We implemented a retrieval-augmented reasoning pipeline inspired by the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) paradigm using LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct as the primary backbone and benchmarked the framework across multiple open instruction-tuned LLMs. Dense semantic retrieval first generated a constrained top-100 LLT candidate set for each AE, followed by structured LLM reasoning to select a single best-matching LLT and deterministic mapping to Preferred Term (PT) and System Organ Class (SOC) levels. The pipeline was evaluated retrospectively on AE datasets from three prospective AML clinical trials (MOSAIC, DELTA, and DaunoDouble) with automated LLT/PT/SOC metrics and expert-assessed Clinical Correctness Rate (CCR). Results: Clinical expert review showed high clinical acceptability of the RAG pipeline across datasets (91-97%). Under automated evaluation, the pipeline achieved LLT exact accuracy of 50-58%, PT accuracy of 78-85%, and SOC accuracy of 90-93%. Zero-shot generation and random candidate selection performed substantially worse. Semantic retrieval more often included the coder-assigned LLT among the candidate terms available to the model than retrieval based on lexical similarity. Multi-model benchmarking showed that backbone choice mainly affected LLT exact agreement, whereas PT and SOC performance remained comparatively stable. Conclusions: Retrieval-augmented reasoning supports clinically aligned MedDRA coding of free-text adverse events under realistic candidate constraints in AML clinical trials. Evaluation across three AML clinical trials showed that strict LLT-level string agreement underestimated clinical ap-propriateness, highlighting the importance of combining hierarchical evaluation metrics with clini-cal expert validation for AI-assisted MedDRA coding in hematology trials.

Background. Accurate delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) - primary tumour (GTVp) and nodal disease (GTVn) - on FDG-PET/CT is a critical step of head and neck radiotherapy planning. Comparisons between lightweight custom networks and the auto-configured nnU-Net v2 are usually reported as end-to-end pipelines, conflating the contribution of the network with that of the inference-time post-processing applied on top of it. We separated the two. Methods. MiniUNet3D (custom 3D U-Net, 18.3 M parameters) and nnU-Net v2 (3d_fullres, 88.2 M parameters) were trained on the same 578 FDG-PET/CT cases (85/15 author-defined split of the HECKTOR 2025 Task 1 set, 8 centres) and evaluated on the same internal cohort. Three arms were compared pairwise: MiniUNet3D raw output at a fixed 0.5 threshold, MiniUNet3D with a locked adaptive post-processing pipeline, and nnU-Net v2. Comparisons used paired Wilcoxon tests with bootstrap confidence intervals, Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and Cohen's d; catastrophic failure (Dice < 0.01) was compared with an exact McNemar test. Cases with an empty reference for a given target were excluded from that target's analysis (n = 98 GTVp, n = 93 GTVn). Results. With post-processing matched off, nnU-Net v2 was superior: median GTVp Dice 0.799 versus 0.592 (mean difference -0.244, 95 % CI -0.300 to -0.191; d = -0.88) and GTVn 0.774 versus 0.598 (d = -0.82). Post-processing raised MiniUNet3D to 0.800 (GTVp) and 0.738 (GTVn), recovering 79 % of that difference. Post-processed, MiniUNet3D matched nnU-Net v2 on GTVp Dice (p = 0.113) but remained inferior on nodal disease after Bonferroni correction (Dice p = 0.041; surface Dice p = 0.049). Catastrophic GTVp failures were 25/98 raw, 8/98 post-processed and 1/98 for nnU-Net v2 (McNemar p = 0.016). Inference took 34 s versus 78 s per case on the same GPU. Conclusions. Post-processing recovered most, but not all, of the difference between the two models, and it did not confer robustness: an eight-fold higher rate of empty contours on small primaries persisted, which is the more consequential difference for planning safety. Pipeline comparisons reported without a post-processing ablation risk attributing to a network what post-processing supplied.

CXR report generation may require a vision-language model (VLM) to produce both textual findings and spatial bounding boxes. Generative 4B-7B VLMs can emit non-empty outputs on normal images and empty outputs on abnormal images, motivating explicit structural routing. To evaluate whether a hard inference-time gate before a probabilistic VLM changes output-presence performance and to identify the mechanisms underlying paired STRUCT outcomes. We evaluated CXRxVLM v2, combining a frozen microsoft/rad-dino ViT-B/14 encoder with a 768[-&gt;]1 logistic probe (threshold 0.0557) and google/medgemma-4b-it with the pamessina/medgemma-4b-it-cure LoRA adapter. A seed=42 stratified cohort of 500 VinDr-CXR train-pool images (250 NORMAL, 250 ABNORMAL) was compared with Lingshu-7B A_baseline and D_fewshot configurations. Exact paired McNemar tests and stratum-level output-presence analyses were prespecified for the primary configurations; MedGemma 1.5 SigLIP was exploratory. CURE achieved STRUCT = 78.0% (390/500; Wilson 95% CI 74.2-81.4), versus 73.8% for Lingshu A_baseline and 74.2% for D_fewshot. Pairwise p-values were 0.0778, 0.1042, and 0.8642. The paired decomposition showed CURE ABNORMAL non-empty-output advantage of +13.6 percentage points versus Lingshu A (p = 0.0012; +14.0 points versus D, p = 0.0007), while Lingshu had higher NORMAL empty-output rates (+5.2 to +6.4 points; p = 0.0106 and p = 0.0004). The full pipeline used 8.87 GB VRAM and 4.92 s/image mean latency; 53% of records used a 25.7 ms warm gate-negative path after model loading. Equivalent overall STRUCT scores concealed two mechanistically different output regimes: CURE favored ABNORMAL non-empty outputs, whereas Lingshu favored NORMAL empty outputs. This paired decomposition, rather than the aggregate score alone, characterizes how hard-gated and probabilistic systems route output presence.

Background. Residual cancer burden (RCB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) offers finer prognostic stratification than binary pathologic complete response, and increasingly guides adjuvant treatment intensity. Predicting four-tier RCB class from preoperative data could inform adjuvant planning before surgery, yet this remains an unmet need; and when two models reach equal discrimination, the key question is which generalizes most reliably. We compared a radiology-focused model with a fully integrated multimodal model for preoperative four-class RCB prediction. Methods. In a single-center, retrospective cohort of 328 patients treated with NAC followed by surgery, 64 clinicopathologic and radiologic variables were organized into thematic blocks. Two configurations were compared: a 17-variable radiology model (Model R) and a 62-variable multimodal model (Model ALL). Three algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM) were evaluated with and without SMOTE using an 80/20 stratified split and 5-fold cross-validation. Model selection combined test AUC, macro-F1, cross-validation-to-test gap, nested cross-validation, bootstrap confidence intervals, and SHAP explainability, following the TRIPOD+AI guidance. Results. RCB classes were distributed as RCB-0 27.4% (n=90), RCB-I 10.4% (n=34), RCB-II 43.6% (n=143), and RCB-III 18.6% (n=61). Model R and Model ALL reached identical test AUC (0.838). Model ALL, however, achieved higher accuracy (0.636 vs 0.530) and macro-F1 (0.602 vs 0.598), together with a substantially smaller cross-validation-to-test gap (0.015 vs 0.099), pointing to more stable generalization; this gap difference persisted across all three algorithms. SHAP analysis showed that the multimodal model drew jointly on imaging phenotype, tumor biology, and disease extent. Both models remained weakest in the RCB-III class. Conclusions. At equivalent discrimination, the multimodal model was methodologically preferable for preoperative RCB prediction, owing to its stability and interpretability - qualities relevant to trustworthy clinical decision support. It remains investigational; a model flagging likely RCB-0 or RCB-III before surgery could prioritize adjuvant-therapy discussions earlier in the care pathway, pending prospective external validation.

The rapid expansion of the oncology literature has outpaced manual curation of clinically relevant gene-cancer-drug associations and oncogenic driver evidence. Existing automated approaches often lack transparency or are difficult to scale across heterogeneous data sources. To address this gap, we developed megaMine, a transparent, rule-based, and context-aware literature-mining framework that integrates therapeutic and driver evidence from PubMed, PubTator, and Europe PMC by combining entity recognition, hierarchical heuristics, and contextual labeling. In therapy mode, megaMine was applied to approximately 100,000 oncology articles published between 2015 and 2025, yielding more than 23,000 structured sentence-level evidence records, with standardized annotations for drug response, resistance, and study context. Internal evaluation of context labels showed the strong separability between efficacy and non-efficacy evidence using ridge logistic regression (AUROC = 0.915; AUPRC = 0.941). Benchmarking against NCI/OncoKB-supported drug-cancer associations showed that curated clinical associations had higher megaMine composite evidence scores than unlabeled comparison pairs [median (IQR): 25.6 (9.07-72.5) vs. 3.61 (1.69-8.69); Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P < 2.2 x 10-16]. In driver mode, megaMine retrieved mutation- and biomarker-related evidence from an ERBB-focused gastric cancer query, generating 750 evidence rows from 200 PMIDs. These results demonstrate that deterministic and interpretable approaches can support scalable evidence extraction for downstream applications such as knowledge graph construction and literature-based evidence synthesis.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high heterogeneity, poor prognosis, and limited targeted treatment options. Bridging the gap between molecular alterations and histopathological morphology remains a major challenge in precision oncology. We propose an interpretable, multi-modal framework that integrates histopathological image analysis with multi-omics profiling (somatic mutations, DNA methylation, copy number alterations), leveraging U-Net-based nuclei segmentation, vision-language models (BLIP), biomedical language models (BioGPT), and explainable AI (SHAP, LIME). Our framework achieves strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.989) and provides transparent, biologically grounded interpretations by integrating morphological features with genomically prioritized biomarkers. Cross-modal analysis confirms established TNBC drivers and generates novel, testable hypotheses associating specific epigenetic alterations with distinct morphological phenotypes. While causal validation requires future wet-lab experiments, our framework accelerates hypothesis-driven biomarker discovery by integrating complementary data modalities with language-based reasoning, providing a transparent foundation for hypothesis generation and clinical translation.

Prognostic models in oncology are developed one cancer at a time, from that cancer's own labelled outcomes, and fail where prognostic information is scarcest. Rare cancers account for roughly a fifth of diagnoses and most paediatric malignancies, yet seldom supply enough events for a reliable time-to-event model. We therefore asked whether a representation learned without outcome labels can supply what those cohorts cannot. A Transformer encoder was pretrained by masked field-value modelling on 9425135 tumour records from the SEER 17 registries, diagnosed in 2000 to 2023. Only diagnosis-time fields passing a fail-closed coding-verification gate were admitted, and each record was emitted as an era-specific and a harmonised view, keeping two decades of recoding auditable. The encoder was then frozen and read by a linear Cox head for overall survival. Nine rare cancers were removed from the pretraining corpus entirely, each requiring an independent pretraining run. On a sealed test partition, all nine exceeded an architecture-identical random frozen encoder in Harrell concordance by +0.0034 to +0.0368, every lower confidence limit above zero. At 256 labelled patients, all 67 cancers favoured the pretrained representation over budget-matched Cox regression, median difference +0.0283. The advantage was bounded: given the entire training set, Cox regression was favoured in seven of nine rare cancers. The encoder did not outperform a field-frequency baseline on its own objective, so upstream reconstruction did not predict downstream transfer. Outcome-agnostic registry pretraining carries prognostic signal into cancers it has never seen, and is most useful where labels are fewest, without establishing clinical utility.

State Cancer Profiles (statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov), maintained by the National Cancer Institute with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is a widely used source of county- and state-level cancer statistics in the United States, used for cancer-center catchment-area surveillance and for geographic studies of cancer burden, screening, and access to care. The site offers no API, no bulk download, and no archive of prior estimates: its sole machine-readable export returns one statistical stratum per HTTP request, and when the underlying data are updated the previous estimates are overwritten and become unrecoverable. This resource provides the complete national county- and state-level extract of all four State Cancer Profiles data topics (incidence, mortality, screening and risk factors, and demographics) as typed, analysis-ready files with the stratifying dimensions as columns, published under pinned, citable version DOIs on Zenodo (concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.11098814). One version DOI is minted per distinct upstream data vintage, the set of values the site served between successive replacements. Three vintages have been captured to date; at each observed vintage boundary roughly 97% of estimate values changed, so which vintage an analysis draws on affects its results. From the 2026-08-24 release forward, cells that the upstream site suppresses are retained as typed nulls with an explicit suppression-reason column. Capture has been automated on an approximately monthly cadence since February 2025, and each future upstream revision will be preserved as a new vintage.

Improvements in data availability, sharing, and integration, together with the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, are advancing precision medicine for pediatric cancer by facilitating diagnosis, biomarker discovery, and drug development. Data sharing commons and initiatives like the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) provide access to pediatric-specific genomic and clinical data cohorts and improve data availability for pediatric cancer research. Based on CCDI, a scalable AI platform, Graph Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Oncology (GAIPO), integrates various data modalities from bulk and single-cell omics data to clinical information. Such multi-modal data facilitates the training and development of advanced XAI models for pediatric cancers. We then developed an end-to-end multi-modality framework, PCGS, for pediatric cancer by incorporating omics-specific representation learning via GNN models with cross-attention fusion and multi-objective learning for downstream tasks such as classification, clustering, and survival analysis. This framework outperforms previous supervised multi-omics integration baseline approaches based on glioma and Wilms tumor cohorts and enables GNN model explainability via Shapley value-based feature attribution approaches to explain the contributions of gene-level features across various biomedical tasks, including classification and survival. Given specific background samples (e.g., age groups, sex, grades) as baselines, this explainable GNN model estimates and ranks the importance scores for input features from each omics modality. It identifies background-specific key features for biomarker discovery, risk group identification, and survival analysis in glioma and Wilms tumor, with potential applicability to other pediatric cancers.

Radiation oncology has a long history of developing in-house health information technology (HIT) tools such as quality assurance (QA) checklists, yet there is little guidance from professional bodies on how to implement these tools in complex clinical environments. Building on our previous work that used human-centered participatory co-design, the Task-User-Representation-Function (TURF) framework, and multi-method usability evaluations to design and develop an enhanced dosimetry QA checklist (DQC), this study investigated the barriers and facilitators (determinants) to implementing the enhanced DQC in a radiation oncology clinic, examined implementation strategies, proposed an implementation framework for QA checklists in radiation oncology, and assessed four implementation outcomes: acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption. We conducted a qualitative implementation study using an abductive research approach at an academic medical center. All key stakeholders (dosimetrists, physicists, trainees, and software developers) participated in semi-structured interviews, field observations, and surveys across pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach, with deductive coding guided by an adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) mapped to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. We identified 4 CFIR constructs and 12 sub-constructs as barriers, with structural characteristics and planning showing the highest negative valence, and 5 CFIR constructs and 19 sub-constructs as facilitators, with relative advantage, culture, and leadership engagement showing the highest positive valence. Participants' suggestions mapped to 19 ERIC strategies in 7 clusters, and the CFIR-ERIC matching tool identified 14 evidence-based strategies in 4 clusters that informed a proposed phased implementation framework. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores improved significantly from pre-implementation to implementation for all professional roles (p<0.05), yet adoption reached 100% only in the sixth week of implementation. These findings highlight the value of combining subjective and objective implementation outcomes and provide a practical, evidence-based framework for implementing in-house QA checklists in radiation oncology that warrants validation in diverse settings.

Purpose: Clinical assessment of vertebral lesion quality (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed) remains subjective, with limited interobserver reliability. This study evaluated a novel application of 3D convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs) for classifying lesion quality from CT volumes in metastatic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used CT data from 151 cancer patients planned for radiotherapy for metastatic spine disease (September 2020-July 2024). Leveraging vertebra-level expert annotations, we introduced an unconventional U-Net-based strategy converting coarse voxel-wise predictions into vertebra-level lesion classifications. The final dataset comprised 2,125 vertebrae across four classes (no lesion, osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed), split into a 3-fold cross-validation set and an independent holdout test set. Model performance was benchmarked against a DenseNet121 baseline and a musculoskeletal radiologist, with Cohen's kappa assessing inter-rater agreement. Results: The 3D model achieved an ensemble accuracy of 84.7%, outperforming DenseNet121 (72.1%), with substantial gains in F1 score, precision, and balanced accuracy. It showed high concordance with the radiologist (Cohen's kappa = 0.76) and comparable sensitivity and specificity across all lesion subtypes. We found both models and the radiologist to struggle with osteolytic lesions, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing this class from age-related changes in vertebral bone density and architecture caused by benign bone lesions, age-related systemic skeletal disorders and cancer treatments. Conclusions: 3D-CNNs trained with vertebra-level labels can accurately and reliably classify vertebral metastatic lesion quality from CT scans, offering a scalable path toward automated characterization of metastatic spine disease to support clinical decision-making and large-scale radiomics research.

Background: Patient-reported measures (PRMs), including patient-reported outcome and experience measures, capture patients perspectives on their health status and healthcare experiences. In cancer genetics, PRMs have been used to assess genetic knowledge, psychosocial outcomes, and decision-making. However, patients must understand these measures to provide useful information, an ability which is influenced by general and health literacy levels. Readability guidelines recommend that patient-facing materials be written at or below a Grade 6 level. This study evaluated the readability of PRMs used in a cancer genetic testing context. Objective: To assess whether PRMs used in heritable cancer genetic testing meet recommended readability levels using validated indices. Methods: PRMs were identified from a recent systematic review of PRMs used in heritable cancer genetic testing, which reported 83 instruments across eight categories. English-language PRMs containing structured question items and response scales were eligible for extraction and converted into plain text for analysis. Readability was assessed using four validated indices: Flesch Kincaid Grading Level (FKGL), FORd, CAylor, and STicht (FORCAST) formula, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) via an automated readability software. Descriptive analysis and numerical comparison evaluated readability levels across PRM categories and against the recommended Grade 6 reading level. Results: Sixty-five PRMs met the eligibility criteria, with most, including validated instruments, exceeding the recommended Grade 6 reading level. Across the eight categories, genetics-specific PRMs required the highest readability levels, indicating higher readability demands. Conclusions: Most PRMs, particularly those specific to genetics, do not meet readability guidelines. This may limit their accessibility to individuals with limited general and health literacy. Development of PRMs specific to genetics should consider strategies to improve readability, such as plain-language approaches and involvement of individuals with limited general or health literacy. Keywords: readability, patient-reported measures, cancer, genetic testing, health literacy

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of somatic variants has become the method of choice in a variety of molecular oncology fields and in the clinic. Its use ranges from sequencing entire tumor genomes and transcriptomes to targeted clinical diagnostic gene panels. The NYU Langone Genome PACT (Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets, LG-PACT) assay is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test that uses targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue matched with normal specimens from patients to detect gene alterations in a targeted panel covering 606 genes and the TERT promoter. Indications for testing are cancer (solid tumors and hematological malignancies) where a mutational profile from multiple genes would be informative for disease stratification, prognosis, or treatment options including targeted therapies and eligibility for clinical trials. The test is intended to provide information on somatic mutations including point mutations, small insertions/deletions (indels), and copy number aberrations for diagnostic and treatment decisions. LG-PACT is a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared diagnostic test (510K: K202304). The clinical interpretation of sequencing data of molecular tumor markers from NGS encompasses automated variant calling tools with human interpretation. This final mostly manual review of data step is intensive, involving highly trained scientists, encompassing literature review, interpretation and clinical tier classification by pathologists, who then provide a complete molecular diagnostic report to the treating oncologists. We provide analysis of 1339 clinical genomic profiles from 31 different cancers and their subtypes, comprising of central nervous system (CNS) 792 (59%) cases (incl. meningioma, glioma and glioblastoma), with 267 (20%) cases predominantly of lung, pancreatic and colorectal and 280 of others (21%). Here, we present the technical challenges of validating an NGS oncological diagnostic targeted assay for clinical grade accuracy and sensitivity for patient care. We show how copy number alterations provide a more comprehensive description of the tumors genomic profile. We then outline the utility of targeted panel sequencing based on certified pathologist selection of reportable variants for our current patient cohort. Where analysis of variant detection has led to 49.4% (661/1339) of our clinical tumor samples containing mutations in known therapy targeted genes, 35.6% (477/1339) with mutation detected in other genes, and 15% (201/1339) cases being negative.

Motivation: Cell-free DNA methylation provides a minimally invasive signal for early cancer detection and tissue-of-origin prediction. Most methods represent methylation measurements as independent fixed-window features and therefore do not explicitly model relationships among genomic regions. Results: We developed PANGEM (Pan-cancer Graph-based Cancer Detection Using the Cell-free DNA Methylome), a graph-learning framework that represents genomic bins as nodes and integrates CpG context, genomic proximity, and sample-specific methylation similarity in the graph topology. Across five repeated stratified train-test splits, PANGEM achieved the highest mean performance among evaluated methods, with an AUROC/AUPR of 0.997/1.000 for binary cancer detection and macro-AUROC/AUPR of 0.977/0.870 for multiclass tissue-of-origin prediction. In the independent INSPIRE cohort, 72 of 78 cancer cases (92.3%) exceeded the binary classification threshold, and PANGEM correctly classified 9 of 17 head and neck cancer cases (52.9%), the highest accuracy among evaluated methods. Subnetwork analysis further identified recurrent, graph-connected methylation patterns, including a 111-DMR subnetwork with increased methylation in cancer samples.

Survival analysis is a fundamental technique in biomedical research for modeling time-to-event data. It enables the identification of prognostic factors in disease, compares survival outcomes across treatment groups, and performs targeted treatment selection. A variety of machine learning (ML) approaches to survival analysis have emerged to complement classical statistical methods, especially for high-dimensional datasets with complex, nonlinear interactions between features. However, using survival ML methods requires addressing challenges such as censoring-unaware evaluation, overfitting, selecting performance metrics, and data leakage. To address these and other difficulties in using survival ML models, we developed the mlsurv software package. mlsurv is an open-source Python package built around three major design principles: 1) methodological rigor, including evidence-based model selection, leakage-free pipelines, and multi-metric evaluation, 2) multi-scale evaluation and interpretation, including population and subpopulation evaluation, patient-level explanations, and feature analysis, and 3) automated trust and transparency, including limitation flagging and TRIPOD+AI-aligned reporting. mlsurv bundles ten models spanning linear, ensemble, kernel, and deep learning families within a unified software package. We demonstrate mlsurv on the Chowell immunotherapy cohort (n=1,479). The survival-trained models achieve a test concordance index of 0.73 for overall survival prediction. Further, risk scores strongly correlate with the response-trained LORIS clinical score (|{rho}| up to 0.84), reflecting the overlap between prognostic and predictive signal. mlsurv enables biomedical researchers to conduct rigorous, multi-model survival analysis and benchmarking using minimal code with default best practices rather than implementing custom scripts and methodological safeguards from scratch.

Doctors increasingly rely on AI in the clinic, yet which report features make AI-generated responses useful and trustworthy remains unclear. In this randomized mixed-methods study, 34 oncology physicians provided 294 ratings of four blinded AI systems across five vignettes, alongside 20 semi-structured interviews analyzed with a prespecified LLM-assisted qualitative pipeline. Despite similar references, an evidence-graded report adapted from OpenEvidence was rated significantly lower in overall utility than standard OpenEvidence (mean difference, -0.96; 95% CI, -1.26 to -0.66; P<.001). Qualitative analysis identified six themes and seven design requirements. Oncologists valued rapid orientation, evidence retrieval, and verification, preferring concise, scannable reports with quantitative outcomes, recognizable bolded guidelines, explicit uncertainty, and verifiable citations. Trust deteriorated with citation mismatch, buried provenance, evidence misclassification, overconfident recommendations, and poor organization. Evidence presented differently can alter perceptions of clinical utility and trust; accuracy alone is insufficient, and report design must also be empirically evaluated.

Background. Patient stratification from multi-omics and clinical data is essential for uncovering disease heterogeneity and moving toward more personalized treatment strategies. However, integrating heterogeneous data layers while identifying robust patient strata remains challenging. Methods. We introduce Reduced Fusion of Multi-Omics Stratification (RedFuMOS), a novel three-step approach for patient stratification based on mixed-type multi-omics data. RedFuMOS extends Similarity Network Fusion to accommodate mixed-type data layers and layer-specific similarity measures for data integration, includes a dimensionality reduction step to mitigate the curse of dimensionality, and performs patient stratification using density-based hierarchical clustering with HDBSCAN. It also implemented an automated optimization procedure to identify the best set of hyperparameters, minimizing the need for manual tuning. Results. RedFuMOS outperformed six state-of-the-art tools for multi-omics patient stratification in a comprehensive simulated benchmarking study, which also confirmed that, although computationally expensive, the dimensionality reduction step is crucial for achieving good stratification performance. Additionally, RedFuMOS identified two clinically relevant patient strata in a small real-world cohort of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia. Conclusion. RedFuMOS provides a flexible framework for integrating heterogeneous multi-omics and clinical data. RedFuMOS is available as an R package at http://github.com/delucasara/RedFuMOS.

Foundation models for chest X-ray interpretation make it possible to adapt specialised visual representations with relatively small trainable modules. We report a retrospective study of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) of Rad-DINO Vision Transformer Base with 14x14 patches (ViT-B/14) for 14-class multi-label classification on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ChestX-ray14 dataset. The official test labels were accessed during earlier model development and configuration comparisons; consequently, every official-test result in this manuscript is explicitly descriptive and non-confirmatory. We used a patient-disjoint 90/10 split of the official trainval pool (77,988 training and 8,536 validation images) and retained the released 25,596-image test partition. The historically selected all-linear LoRA configuration with safe augmentation and g=37 produced a descriptive test macro AUROC of 0.8462 versus the frozen baseline of 0.8295. Comparisons of target modules, patch-token grids, and a Rad-DINO-specific local query head are reported as retrospective comparisons rather than unbiased model-selection evidence. A confident-learning diagnostic flagged 17,653 of 86,524 trainval images (20.4%); this is a model-based flag rate, not a ground-truth label-error rate. A separate counterfactual relabeling sensitivity analysis, which uses the same model to identify and rescore disagreements, changed the descriptive AUROC to approximately 0.9445 after 6,509 policy-defined flips. This value is not achieved model performance and is not a radiologist-audited label-quality ceiling. We provide a validation-only threshold and artifact protocol for future locked evaluation, but a genuinely untouched holdout and new locked selection are required for a confirmatory headline. The existing Zenodo record contains the 25 publication figures only.

Objectives Accurate phenotyping of cases and controls is essential for studying biological and environmental contributors to disease in large biobanks. We aimed to develop a flexible, customizable, and reproducible electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotyping framework for identifying disease cases and generating matched control cohorts for downstream analyses. Here, we developed the Phenotyping Algorithm for Cases and matched Controls using EHR-based Rules (PACER). Materials and Methods Applying PACER to the All of Us Research Program Curated Data Repository v8.0, we identified female breast cancer (BC) cases identified among participants recorded as female at birth using at least two BC-associated diagnostic Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership concept IDs documented at least 30 days apart. A one-to-one matched control cohort was generated by jointly matching on sex, age, genetic ancestry, and state-level residency. Clinical, socioeconomic, and genomic data were integrated for analysis. Results We identified 10,225 BC cases and generated a control cohort of the same size matched for key demographic characteristics. Comparison with a phecodeX-based BC cohort showed 91.03% agreement. Among cases responding to relevant survey items, 80.86% self-reported a personal history of BC, compared to 1.89% of controls. We detected an enrichment of BC-associated GWAS catalog variants, pathogenic mutations in known risk genes, and higher polygenic risk scores in cases compared to controls. Discussion and Conclusion Concordance across a phecodeX-based cohort, self-reported survey responses, and genomic analyses supports the validity of PACER-defined cohorts. PACER is publicly available and readily adaptable to other diseases, supporting future research in risk modeling and precision medicine.